Chromium picolinate

View my plan →

The short answer

Glucose and weight effects are small or inconsistent outside deficiency.

Evidence and scope: Mixed evidence
This status does not grade the ingredient for every goal, outcome, or person.
Important limitation: Trials are inconsistent or small, so a reliable clinically important benefit is not established.
Before deciding: Key concern: Insulin or diabetes medicines, kidney/liver disease, thyroid medicine, and psychiatric medicines require review.

01 / PRACTICAL GUIDE

Dose, absorption, and combinations

These are indication-specific reference or studied ranges—not a personalized prescription. Start with the objective, then check the form, label, medicines, and health conditions.

Reference range by objective

Glucose-related research200–1,000 mcg/day in trials; no routine need established

Reference or studied range—not a personalized prescription. The product label or a clinician may specify a different dose.

Dose source ↗

More is not automatically better. A clinician or product label may specify a different amount.

Absorption / solubilityWater-soluble

Water-soluble or readily water-dispersible. This does not mean excess is always harmless.

How it is commonly taken

Take with food.

Do not combine casually

Insulin or diabetes medicines, kidney/liver disease, thyroid medicine, and psychiatric medicines require review.

Dose and use source ↗

Dose and use links lead to primary or official source material. Search links are discovery tools, not proof that every returned paper applies.

02 / EVIDENCE

What the research says

We keep supportive, mixed, negative, safety, and contextual findings together. The headline never replaces the underlying papers.

1research papers in this ledger

10unique primary studies represented

489unique participants represented

These are audited counts for this JIVANA collection, not search-result totals. Participants are counted once when multiple papers use the same cohort; review papers are not added again to participant totals.

Open the research timelineResearch timeline

Entries are ordered by publication year. A study period appears only when the source reports it.

2003

Does not support the tested claimPMID 12664086

Chromium picolinate for body-weight reduction

The pooled difference was only 1.1 kg and became non-significant when a single influential trial was excluded. Clinical relevance was doubtful, robustness was poor, and only three trials reported adverse events.

Published: 2003n=489 participants10 primary studies represented

Study design and methods

Design: Meta-analysis of 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
Population: 489 participants across pooled body-weight trials
Intervention: Chromium picolinate supplementation versus placebo
Outcome: Body weight and reported adverse events

Open research record ↗

Unscreened discovery appendix—not evidence10 candidate publicationsSearch run: Aug 21, 2026

Complete for the displayed PubMed query at the search timestamp—not for all databases or every possible synonym. Candidates can be irrelevant, duplicate the same study, or report negative findings. They are never summed as evidence or participants until screened.

03 / SOURCES

Start with the source material

Official evidence overviewPubMed bounded human-evidence search Live PubMed discovery searchNational Library of Medicine

The live search is for discovery only. Search-result counts change and are not included in the audited totals above.

Recent PubMed discovery recordsDirect links to the first 12 records returned by the reproducible search. These are discovery candidates—not reviewed summaries or a count of supportive findings.

04 / EXPERT CONTEXT

Expert context—not evidence

Expert positions are dated context—not scientific evidence. They never raise the evidence status or become consensus by repetition.

No direct, source-verified endorsement is currently recorded. Research authorship or discussion alone is not treated as endorsement.