The short answer
Human trials of blood pressure, inflammation, allergy, and exercise are inconsistent.
- Evidence and scope
- Mixed evidence
This status does not grade the ingredient for every goal, outcome, or person.
- Important limitation
- Trials are inconsistent or small, so a reliable clinically important benefit is not established.
- Before deciding
- Key concern: Anticoagulants, cyclosporine, antibiotics, kidney disease, pregnancy, and CYP interactions require review.
01 / PRACTICAL GUIDE
Dose, absorption, and combinations
These are indication-specific reference or studied ranges—not a personalized prescription. Start with the objective, then check the form, label, medicines, and health conditions.
Reference or studied range—not a personalized prescription. The product label or a clinician may specify a different dose.
Dose source ↗More is not automatically better. A clinician or product label may specify a different amount.
Fat-soluble or lipid-based. Absorption generally improves with a meal containing fat.
Take with food; formulation strongly affects exposure.
Anticoagulants, cyclosporine, antibiotics, kidney disease, pregnancy, and CYP interactions require review.
Dose and use links lead to primary or official source material. Search links are discovery tools, not proof that every returned paper applies.
02 / EVIDENCE
What the research says
We keep supportive, mixed, negative, safety, and contextual findings together. The headline never replaces the underlying papers.
These are audited counts for this JIVANA collection, not search-result totals. Participants are counted once when multiple papers use the same cohort; review papers are not added again to participant totals.
Open the research timelineResearch timeline+
Entries are ordered by publication year. A study period appears only when the source reports it.
Quercetin supplementation and blood pressure
Pooled systolic and diastolic pressure fell by about 3.0 and 2.6 mmHg. Effects appeared in trials using at least 500 mg/day, but indirect dose comparisons were not significant; clinical relevance and cardiovascular outcomes remain unproven.
Study design and methods
- Design
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 placebo-controlled randomized trials with 9 treatment arms
- Population
- 587 participants across randomized blood-pressure trials
- Intervention
- Quercetin supplementation versus placebo
- Outcome
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Unscreened discovery appendix—not evidence312 candidate publicationsSearch run: Aug 21, 2026
Complete for the displayed PubMed query at the search timestamp—not for all databases or every possible synonym. Candidates can be irrelevant, duplicate the same study, or report negative findings. They are never summed as evidence or participants until screened.
03 / SOURCES
Start with the source material
The live search is for discovery only. Search-result counts change and are not included in the audited totals above.
Recent PubMed discovery recordsDirect links to the first 12 records returned by the reproducible search. These are discovery candidates—not reviewed summaries or a count of supportive findings.
- Exploratory pilot trial of a multicomponent immunonutritional supplement in children with allergic asthma and rhinitis: The INAPRA study.Caldaria E, Iorio R, Marziali D et al. · 2026 · International immunopharmacology · PMID 42202393Open on PubMed ↗
- Phytochemical synergy in artemisia annua herbal tea against malaria: a systematic review of its efficacy and safety in the context of emerging Pfkelch13 resistance.Nkola JMW, Zalagile PA, Mbutshu HL et al. · 2026 · Infectious diseases of poverty · PMID 42596018Open on PubMed ↗
- Quercetin prophylaxis in prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS): a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled phase-II clinical trials.Sagi SSK, Kirar V, Prasad J et al. · 2026 · European journal of nutrition · PMID 42435069Open on PubMed ↗
- Assessment of the Efficacy of Quercetin in Adult Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Rezaeifar A, Motamed M, Mohebbi N · 2026 · Human psychopharmacology · PMID 42438230Open on PubMed ↗
- Effects of turmeric and curcumin in patients on dialysis or using immunosuppressive agents: a systematic review.Rajabian F, Khajavi Rad A, Ghorban Sabbagh M et al. · 2026 · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · PMID 42047771Open on PubMed ↗
- [Chonggu Granules attenuate cartilage injury in knee osteoarthritis patients with liver-kidney deficiency syndrome by regulating the Nrf2 pathway].Cheng Y, Huang C, Zhang J et al. · 2026 · Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · PMID 42198963Open on PubMed ↗
- Immune Preconditioning with Oral Quercetin Supplement and COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Responses: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Takahama S, Nogimori T, Tanaka A et al. · 2026 · The Journal of nutrition · PMID 41759822Open on PubMed ↗
- Effect of a Nutraceutical Combination on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.Jastrząb R, Małecki A, Kmiecik-Małecka E et al. · 2026 · Nutrients · PMID 41829958Open on PubMed ↗
- Modulation of mitochondrial biogenesis by flavonoids via SIRT1 signalling in metabolic syndrome: a systematic review.Sahariah P, Saikia L, Bharali A et al. · 2026 · Molecular biology reports · PMID 41733709Open on PubMed ↗
- Hyperoside-Rich Blueberry Leaf Tea Improves Sleep Continuity in Adults with Poor Sleep: A Two-Week Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Shoji K, Yuasa T, Kitajima Y et al. · 2026 · Nutrients · PMID 41683277Open on PubMed ↗
- Imera cultivar carob: clinical glycemic effects and phytochemical profile.Amerikanou C, Kleftaki SA, Koutoulogenis K et al. · 2025 · Food chemistry · PMID 41166808Open on PubMed ↗
- Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence.Cassotta M, Cao Q, Hu H et al. · 2025 · Nutrients · PMID 41470797Open on PubMed ↗
04 / EXPERT CONTEXT
Expert context—not evidence
Expert positions are dated context—not scientific evidence. They never raise the evidence status or become consensus by repetition.
No direct, source-verified endorsement is currently recorded. Research authorship or discussion alone is not treated as endorsement.